Coronial
NSWother

Inquest into the death of SR

Demographics

18y, male

Date of death

2013-08-13

Finding date

2015-04-02

Cause of death

combination of blunt force injuries to chest and head from falling onto train roof and subsequently falling from train roof to platform

AI-generated summary

An 18-year-old with depression and recent psychological trauma jumped from a railway bridge intending suicide. He struck a destination board and fell onto a train roof instead of in front of it. During a police rescue operation, while waiting for overhead electrical power to be de-energised (taking 14-17 minutes via standard safety protocol), he fell from the roof onto the platform and struck his head. He died from combined blunt force injuries to chest and head. The coroner found the police operation well-conducted, the railway response appropriate following safety protocols established post-Waterfall, and the officers involved acted with compassion and professionalism under impossible circumstances. No clinician errors were identified as the death occurred in a railway setting outside normal medical care.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • depression
  • recent psychological trauma
  • suicide attempt
  • accidental fall onto train roof during suicide attempt
  • fall from train roof during rescue operation
  • delay in de-energising overhead electrical power due to safety procedures
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —