Coronial
NSWcommunity

Inquest into the death of Jason William REA

Deceased

Jason William Rea

Demographics

38y, male

Date of death

2014-02-05

Finding date

2015-06-26

Cause of death

The combined effect of Methylamphetamine Toxicity and prolonged restraint in a person suffering from single vessel coronary artery disease

AI-generated summary

Jason Rea, a 38-year-old chronic methamphetamine user, died following a high-speed collision on the M1 Freeway while driving under the influence. After the crash, he became aggressive and agitated, requiring restraint by police and paramedics. He went into cardiac arrest shortly after paramedics inserted a cannula while attempting to sedate him. The coroner found his death resulted from combined methamphetamine toxicity (extremely high levels >10mg/L), prolonged restraint, and underlying single-vessel coronary artery disease (75-80% stenosis). Police restraint was deemed appropriate and minimal contributor to death. Paramedic care was professional. The case highlights methamphetamine's devastating cardiovascular effects and the importance of recognising drug-induced psychosis and excited delirium in emergency management.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Chronic methamphetamine use with extremely high blood levels (>10 mg/L)
  • Underlying 75-80% stenosis of left anterior descending coronary artery
  • Drug-induced psychosis and agitation
  • Prolonged restraint in prone position
  • Possible respiratory compromise from rib fractures and prone positioning
  • Cardiac arrhythmia secondary to drug toxicity and cardiac stress
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —