Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Housam ISMAIL

Deceased

Housam Ismail

Demographics

21y, male

Date of death

2012-02-22

Finding date

2015-11-18

Cause of death

head and neck injuries including skull fracture and probable fractures to the upper cervical spine

AI-generated summary

A 21-year-old man died from head and neck injuries sustained as a passenger in a vehicle driven by an impaired driver during a police pursuit. The driver had consumed cannabis and diazepam before operating the vehicle at excessive speed through a 50 kph zone. When police attempted to stop the vehicle for a minor traffic violation, the driver accelerated and evaded, leading to a high-speed pursuit lasting approximately one minute. The vehicle failed to stop at a red light intersection and collided with another vehicle. The coroner found no fault with the police officer's conduct of the pursuit, which was conducted at safe distances with appropriate risk assessment and a predetermined termination point. The death resulted from the combination of impaired driving, excessive speed, and failure to comply with traffic signals, not from inappropriate police action.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • driver impairment from cannabis and diazepam
  • excessive speed in 50 kph zone
  • failure to stop at stop sign
  • failure to comply with police direction to stop
  • passenger not wearing seatbelt
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —