Coronial
NSWhospital

Inquest into the death of Edna Beryl WHALEN

Deceased

Edna Beryl Whalen

Demographics

89y, female

Date of death

2007-02-01

Finding date

2014-12-05

Cause of death

Pulmonary embolism due to deep venous thrombosis

AI-generated summary

Edna Beryl Whalen, aged 89, died from pulmonary embolism secondary to deep vein thrombosis following delayed diagnosis of a femoral neck fracture. She fell on 8 January 2007 at an aged care facility and reported hip pain, but the fracture was not diagnosed until 31 January 2007—a 23-day delay. The coroner found Dr D.-Mustapha's initial ED assessment was inadequate; she failed to order hip X-rays despite a clear history of fall with hip pain, mobility loss, and inability to weight bear. The coroner was critical of her detailed physical examination account, delivered only at the fresh inquest, finding it 'recent invention'. A timely X-ray would likely have identified the fracture, allowing earlier surgery and reducing thromboembolism risk. The coroner emphasised that clinical judgment requires confirmatory imaging and that radiological testing should not be deferred based on examination alone.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Delayed diagnosis of femoral neck fracture by 23 days
  • Failure to order hip X-ray in emergency department despite clear clinical indicators
  • Immobility from undiagnosed fracture leading to thromboembolic complications
  • Fractured neck of left femur
  • Congestive heart failure
  • Coronary heart disease
  • Prior myocardial infarction
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —