Coronial
ACTcommunity

Inquest into the death of ANTHONY ROMANAS CARISTO

Deceased

Anthony Romanas Caristo

Demographics

54y, male

Coroner

Coroner Stewart

Date of death

2017-10-31

Finding date

2020-09-25

Cause of death

Cardiac arrest in a person with cardiac hypertrophy and generalised atherosclerosis whilst exhibiting features of excited delirium syndrome and self-harm who died following being placed under physical restraint by AFP officers and the application of an electrical current from a conducted electrical weapon when under the influence of very high and potentially lethal levels of methamphetamine

AI-generated summary

Anthony Caristo died from cardiac arrest on 31 October 2017 following police deployment of a taser during a mental health crisis. He had consumed a lethal dose of methamphetamine, was actively self-harming with knives, and exhibited psychotic behaviour. Police reasonably believed immediate action was required to prevent further self-harm and enable medical treatment. The taser was justified and deployed appropriately. Cardiac arrest resulted from multiple combined factors: methamphetamine toxicity, excited delirium syndrome, underlying cardiac disease, physical restraint, and taser use—no single cause identified. The coroner found no negligence by attending officers. Key clinical lesson: enhanced training on excited delirium syndrome risks, post-taser medical observation protocols, and taser restrictions for vulnerable populations (psychotic, intoxicated, mentally unwell) should be implemented to guide future police responses.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineparamedicineforensic medicine

Error types

delaysystem

Drugs involved

methamphetamineamphetaminealcohol

Clinical conditions

excited delirium syndromemethamphetamine toxicityacute psychosisself-harmcardiac arrestcardiac hypertrophygeneralised atherosclerosis

Procedures

TASER deploymenthandcuffingcardiopulmonary resuscitation

Contributing factors

  • methamphetamine toxicity (lethal dose)
  • excited delirium syndrome
  • underlying cardiac disease (cardiac hypertrophy and atherosclerosis)
  • acute self-harm with knife
  • psychotic episode
  • physical restraint and handcuffing
  • conducted electrical weapon (taser) use
  • possible delayed breathing observation post-taser

Coroner's recommendations

  1. AFP governance and training in relation to tasers should be reviewed to enhance identifying and understanding: (a) inherent risk of taser use in vulnerable groups (psychotic, intoxicated, mentally unwell, pregnant women, children); (b) criterion for taser use; (c) use of negotiators; (d) taser use restrictions; (e) post-use medical care; (f) post-use observation; (g) positional asphyxia risk; (h) post-use rough handling; (i) excited delirium syndrome (EDS) recognition and associated vulnerabilities; (j) communication strategies in all above situations
  2. AFP to report back within 12 months on changes made to taser governance and training
  3. Standard reporting should occur in all cases involving use of force with no ad hoc exceptions
  4. AFP to conduct review or audit of communications response on 31 October 2017 to identify systemic issues regarding failure to provide available intelligence to attending officers and report back within 12 months
  5. Family submissions on CO 3 review and use of tasers should be considered by AFP
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.