Mr Edward Davis, an 88-year-old man with epilepsy, stroke, dementia and on anticoagulation therapy, fell onto a Stand-Up Lifter positioned directly in front of him while waiting for a second staff member to operate it. His head struck the machine's arm support, causing a left frontal lobe haemorrhage from which he subsequently died. While the fall was accidental and staff conduct was appropriate, the coroner found the impact was potentially preventable because the lifter need not have been positioned in front of the patient before both operators were present. The case highlights a systemic risk in aged care equipment setup practices and inadequate facility response to safety concerns raised by the coroner.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
geriatric medicineemergency medicineneurologypalliative care
Error types
systemprocedural
Drugs involved
blood thinning medications
Clinical conditions
epidural haemorrhageepilepsystrokedementia
Procedures
sling lifter operationCT scan
Contributing factors
Stand-Up Lifter positioned in front of patient before second operator was present
patient fall from bed edge
anticoagulation therapy increasing bleeding risk
brain atrophy from dementia increasing vulnerability to impact injury
inadequate facility response to coroner's safety concerns
Coroner's recommendations
BUPA Calwell should review and revise practices, policies, and staff training in respect of positioning sling lifters around patients prior to active deployment of equipment
Australian Aged Care Quality Agency to receive findings for information and any action considered appropriate in relation to these types of lifters
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.